http://www.pengutronix.de/development/kernel/arm-benchmarks-20100702_en.html
Some quick tests of lmbench on a Sheevaplug: mcuelenaere@kot:/dev/shm/lmbench3/bin/armv5tel-linux-gnu$ ./lat_ops integer bit: 0.85 nanoseconds integer add: 0.02 nanoseconds integer mul: 0.42 nanoseconds integer div: 147.77 nanoseconds integer mod: 36.94 nanoseconds int64 bit: 1.71 nanoseconds int64 add: 0.04 nanoseconds int64 mul: 0.92 nanoseconds int64 div: 425.89 nanoseconds int64 mod: 273.85 nanoseconds float add: 36.25 nanoseconds float mul: 30.32 nanoseconds float div: 161.29 nanoseconds double add: 51.21 nanoseconds double mul: 46.31 nanoseconds double div: 542.06 nanoseconds float bogomflops: 325.59 nanoseconds double bogomflops: 799.14 nanoseconds mcuelenaere@kot:/dev/shm/lmbench3/bin/armv5tel-linux-gnu$ mbw 128 Long uses 4 bytes. Allocating 2*33554432 elements = 268435456 bytes of memory. Using 262144 bytes as blocks for memcpy block copy test. Getting down to business... Doing 10 runs per test. 0 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.48203 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 265.546 MiB/s 1 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.48165 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 265.751 MiB/s 2 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.48163 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 265.764 MiB/s 3 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.49714 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 257.473 MiB/s 4 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.48168 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 265.737 MiB/s 5 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.48163 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 265.764 MiB/s 6 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.49695 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 257.570 MiB/s 7 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.48196 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 265.579 MiB/s 8 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.48164 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 265.761 MiB/s 9 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.49695 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 257.570 MiB/s AVG Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.48633 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 263.198 MiB/s 0 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.29804 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 429.475 MiB/s 1 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.29807 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 429.429 MiB/s 2 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.29815 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 429.310 MiB/s 3 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.29800 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 429.530 MiB/s 4 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.31337 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 408.458 MiB/s 5 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.29805 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 429.462 MiB/s 6 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.29808 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 429.411 MiB/s 7 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.29801 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 429.510 MiB/s 8 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.29809 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 429.403 MiB/s 9 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.31339 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 408.437 MiB/s AVG Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.30113 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 425.072 MiB/s 0 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.21906 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 584.317 MiB/s 1 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.21554 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 593.852 MiB/s 2 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.21577 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 593.238 MiB/s 3 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.21671 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 590.646 MiB/s 4 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.21479 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 595.942 MiB/s 5 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.23519 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 544.232 MiB/s 6 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.21705 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 589.734 MiB/s 7 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.59684 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 214.464 MiB/s 8 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.21699 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 589.889 MiB/s 9 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.21418 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 597.642 MiB/s AVG Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.25621 MiB: 128.00000 Copy: 499.589 MiB/s Couldn't get lat_ctx to work. mcuelenaere@kot:/dev/shm/lmbench3/bin/armv5tel-linux-gnu$ ./lat_syscall open Simple open/close: 7.2754 microseconds mcuelenaere@kot:/dev/shm/lmbench3/bin/armv5tel-linux-gnu$ ./lat_syscall open /dev/shm/lmbench3.tar Simple open/close: 6.9399 microseconds mcuelenaere@kot:/dev/shm/lmbench3/bin/armv5tel-linux-gnu$ ./lat_proc fork Process fork+exit: 763.5714 microseconds mcuelenaere@kot:/dev/shm/lmbench3/bin/armv5tel-linux-gnu$ cat /proc/cpuinfo Processor : Feroceon 88FR131 rev 1 (v5l) BogoMIPS : 1192.75 Features : swp half thumb fastmult edsp CPU implementer : 0x56 CPU architecture: 5TE CPU variant : 0x2 CPU part : 0x131 CPU revision : 1 Hardware : Marvell SheevaPlug Reference Board Revision : 0000 Serial : 0000000000000000 I'm not sure if I'm doing this right, but it looks like the Sheevaplug beats all ARM chips (except on FP) on the tests done at [1]. Looks like these tests heavily depend on the clock frequency.
全站熱搜
留言列表